| To: | Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: xfs filesystems greater than 1 TB with inode size = 256? |
| From: | Iustin Pop <lists-xfs@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 23 Dec 2003 23:39:41 +0200 |
| Cc: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>, Stephan L Jansen <jansen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <3FE89359.60406@xxxxxxx> |
| Mail-followup-to: | Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>, Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>, Stephan L Jansen <jansen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| References: | <Pine.LNX.4.44.0312231233390.23629-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <3FE89359.60406@xxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.4i |
On Tue, Dec 23, 2003 at 01:11:21PM -0600, Steve Lord wrote:
> However, things will behave a little better with the larger
> inode size.
Hello,
Could you please explain why and maybe also give some explanations about
how this affects performance on smaller filesystems (<1TB)? I didn't
find anywhere informations related to inode size impact, and I wonder if
tuning it makes a difference.
Thanks,
Iustin Pop
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: xfs filesystems greater than 1 TB with inode size = 256?, Steve Lord |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: xfs filesystems greater than 1 TB with inode size = 256?, Steve Lord |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: xfs filesystems greater than 1 TB with inode size = 256?, Steve Lord |
| Next by Thread: | Re: xfs filesystems greater than 1 TB with inode size = 256?, Steve Lord |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |