|To:||Austin Gonyou <austin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>|
|Subject:||Re: Fwd: XFS merged in 2.4|
|From:||Jeremy Jackson <jerj@xxxxxxxxxxxx>|
|Date:||Wed, 10 Dec 2003 15:42:34 -0500|
|Cc:||Ethan Benson <erbenson@xxxxxxxxxx>, XFS List <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>|
|User-agent:||Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.0.0) Gecko/20020623 Debian/1.0.0-0.woody.1|
Austin Gonyou wrote:
ACLs are also available for even many virtual FS in 2.6 now, with many backports going to 2.4 for bugfixes, etc. Since ACLs are part of the XFS code-base, I'd imagine they'd come along. Christoph?
As for dmapi - they probably want it at the VFS layer so other FS can implement it, rather than just tunneling through VFS with an ioctl to XFS specific API.
|<Prev in Thread]||Current Thread||[Next in Thread>|
|Previous by Date:||[Bug 209] Kernel 2.4.20-xfs memory leaks, bugzilla-daemon|
|Next by Date:||kernel BUG on umount with XFS 1.3.1, Jeremy Jackson|
|Previous by Thread:||Re: Fwd: XFS merged in 2.4, Austin Gonyou|
|Next by Thread:||Re: Fwd: XFS merged in 2.4, Christoph Hellwig|
|Indexes:||[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]|