| To: | Austin Gonyou <austin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Fwd: XFS merged in 2.4 |
| From: | Jeremy Jackson <jerj@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 10 Dec 2003 15:42:34 -0500 |
| Cc: | Ethan Benson <erbenson@xxxxxxxxxx>, XFS List <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20031210101142.GF3294@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1071076851.2337.6.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.0.0) Gecko/20020623 Debian/1.0.0-0.woody.1 |
Austin Gonyou wrote: ACLs are also available for even many virtual FS in 2.6 now, with many backports going to 2.4 for bugfixes, etc. Since ACLs are part of the XFS code-base, I'd imagine they'd come along. Christoph? As for dmapi - they probably want it at the VFS layer so other FS can implement it, rather than just tunneling through VFS with an ioctl to XFS specific API. Cheers, Jeremy |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [Bug 209] Kernel 2.4.20-xfs memory leaks, bugzilla-daemon |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | kernel BUG on umount with XFS 1.3.1, Jeremy Jackson |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Fwd: XFS merged in 2.4, Austin Gonyou |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Fwd: XFS merged in 2.4, Christoph Hellwig |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |