| To: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Fwd: XFS merged in 2.4 |
| From: | Stefan Smietanowski <stesmi@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 08 Dec 2003 21:34:12 +0100 |
| Cc: | Austin Gonyou <austin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, XFS List <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <1070913915.9510.11.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <1070909208.4918.0.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1070913046.2449.53.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1070913915.9510.11.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031007 |
Eric Sandeen wrote: On Mon, 2003-12-08 at 13:50, Austin Gonyou wrote:I'm also kind of curious about the replication of updates andbackporting of bug fixes, etc from 2.6 and vice versa.i.e. will XFS version for 2.6 and 2.4 remain in-sync?In code you get from SGI (cvs, etc) - yes, almost in lock-step. In code you get from Marcelo and Linus, there will be gaps due to different release schedules. -Eric The important step is that after all this time XFS will finally be in both stable and experimental kernels as a default option. ... unless of course 2.6.0 comes out before 2.4.24 does in which case XFS will be in the latest stable and the previous stable series :) // Stefan |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Fwd: XFS merged in 2.4, Stefan Smietanowski |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | PARTIAL TAKE 906019 -, Eric Sandeen |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Fwd: XFS merged in 2.4, Eric Sandeen |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Fwd: XFS merged in 2.4, Gabor Burjan |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |