| To: | freemyer-ml@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Fwd: XFS merged in 2.4 |
| From: | Stefan Smietanowski <stesmi@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 08 Dec 2003 21:32:21 +0100 |
| Cc: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <1070909208.4918.0.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <3FD46C3A.9010000@xxxxxxxxxx> <1070909208.4918.0.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031007 |
Greg Freemyer wrote: That means XFS should be in 2.4.24? Or in a later version. On Mon, 2003-12-08 at 07:19, Stefan Smietanowski wrote:Thought everybody would be interested. Not everybody are on lkml. // Stefan -------- Original Message -------- Subject: XFS merged in 2.4 Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2003 09:22:16 -0200 (BRST) From: Marcelo Tosatti <marcelo.tosatti@xxxxxxxxxxxx> To: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx FYI Christoph reviewed XFS patch which changed generic code, and it was stripped down later to a set of changes which dont modify the code behaviour (except for a few bugfixes which should have been included separately anyway) and are pretty obvious. So its that has been merged, along with fs/xfs/. It's in the latest BK that will eventually become 2.4.24 yes. // Stefan |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Fwd: XFS merged in 2.4, Eric Sandeen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Fwd: XFS merged in 2.4, Stefan Smietanowski |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Fwd: XFS merged in 2.4, Austin Gonyou |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Fwd: XFS merged in 2.4, Dean Roehrich |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |