xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: do_brk() -- kernel 2.4.20-24.9.XFS ?

To: Jan-Frode Myklebust <janfrode@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: do_brk() -- kernel 2.4.20-24.9.XFS ?
From: Net Llama! <netllama@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2003 10:29:44 -0500 (EST)
Cc: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20031208090604.GA3153@xxxxxxxxx>
References: <20031204220923.GB2849@xxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.44.0312042022250.19532-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20031208090604.GA3153@xxxxxxxxx>
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Mon, 8 Dec 2003, Jan-Frode Myklebust wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 08:23:27PM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> > I'd suggest getting Axel's RPM from atrpms... that's what
> > I just did for my home system.  :)  It's easy enough
> > for us to spin one, but now that Axel is doing this, I'm
> > happy to point over there...
>
> I still can't find any updated kernel from Axel's atrpms.
> The kernels there seems all to be based on RedHats 2.4.20-20.x
> without any mention of extra patches for the do_brk().
>
> I'm a bit disappointed that SGI isn't more closely following up on
> security patches or redhat errata kernels. If it's "easy enough",
> why not just do it, and stop pushing a kernel with a serious security
> vulnerability from the project home page?

Maybe cause you can very easily build your own 2.4.23-xfs with the patch
that SGI already provides?

-- 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Lonni J Friedman                                netllama@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Linux Step-by-step & TyGeMo                  http://netllama.ipfox.com


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>