|To:||Marcelo Tosatti <marcelo.tosatti@xxxxxxxxxxxx>|
|Subject:||Re: XFS for 2.4|
|From:||Austin Gonyou <austin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>|
|Date:||Tue, 02 Dec 2003 12:05:26 -0600|
|Cc:||Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx>, Larry McVoy <lm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, XFS List <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>|
On Tue, 2003-12-02 at 05:22, Marcelo Tosatti wrote: > [...] > My whole point is "2.6 is almost out of the door and its so much > better". > Its much faster, much cleaner. I agree with this, even in spite of my earlier arguments. I do like 2.6, but I think there are some valid points listed recently for 2.4 inclusion. I might just be an end-user, but I do appreciate XFS for what it is, and have been using it for a while now. It just seems like natural inclusion at this point almost "just makes sense." -- Austin Gonyou <austin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Coremetrics, Inc.
|<Prev in Thread]||Current Thread||[Next in Thread>|