| To: | Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: XFS for 2.4 |
| From: | venom@xxxxxx |
| Date: | Tue, 2 Dec 2003 17:57:29 +0100 (CET) |
| Cc: | Darrell Michaud <dmichaud@xxxxxxx>, Marcelo Tosatti <marcelo.tosatti@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Russell Cattelan <cattelan@xxxxxxx>, Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx>, <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <20031202162808.GC22608@xxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Tue, 2 Dec 2003, Jeff Garzik wrote: > > This can also be done in patch form, as it is done now :) > of course. 2.4 systems that are already using XFS as a patch probably would have a benefit to see it integrated into 2.4 kernel, but they would is it anyway as a patch. I do not think the merge would be usefull thinking to a from2.4/to2.6 upgrade. In fact, if a system is not using XFS already, it is difficoult that a filesystem is changed if it is an upgrade and not a reinstallation. So, at the end, to have XFS just as a patch for 2.4 is not so bad. Luigi |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: XFS for 2.4, Austin Gonyou |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: XFS for 2.4, Jeff Garzik |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: XFS for 2.4, Jeff Garzik |
| Next by Thread: | Re: XFS for 2.4, Stefan Smietanowski |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |