| To: | Ethan Benson <erbenson@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: XFS for 2.4 |
| From: | Jeremy Jackson <jerj@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 02 Dec 2003 11:08:25 -0500 |
| Cc: | Marcelo Tosatti <marcelo.tosatti@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| References: | <20031202002347.GD621@frodo> <Pine.LNX.4.44.0312020919410.13692-100000@xxxxxxxxxx> <20031202120642.GC962@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.0.0) Gecko/20020623 Debian/1.0.0-0.woody.1 |
One example is EVMS (device-mapper) snapshots. Not stable in 2.6, yet
related to XFS.
It would be nice if the XFS team could maintain patches for newer 2.4 kernels of official releases (ie 1.3.1). This would ease the tension somewhat. Regards, Jeremy Jackson Ethan Benson wrote: On Tue, Dec 02, 2003 at 09:22:48AM -0200, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:My whole point is "2.6 is almost out of the door and its so much better". Its much faster, much cleaner.2.6.10 is NOT almost out the door, and the fact is a great many are not going to trust it till then. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: XFS for 2.4, Darrell Michaud |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: XFS for 2.4, Jeremy Jackson |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: XFS for 2.4, Ethan Benson |
| Next by Thread: | Re: XFS for 2.4, Austin Gonyou |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |