| To: | Marcelo Tosatti <marcelo.tosatti@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: XFS for 2.4 |
| From: | Ethan Benson <erbenson@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 2 Dec 2003 03:06:42 -0900 |
| Cc: | Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.LNX.4.44.0312020919410.13692-100000@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Mail-copies-to: | erbenson@xxxxxxxxxx |
| Mail-followup-to: | Marcelo Tosatti <marcelo.tosatti@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| References: | <20031202002347.GD621@frodo> <Pine.LNX.4.44.0312020919410.13692-100000@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.3.28i |
On Tue, Dec 02, 2003 at 09:22:48AM -0200, Marcelo Tosatti wrote: > > My whole point is "2.6 is almost out of the door and its so much better". > Its much faster, much cleaner. 2.6.10 is NOT almost out the door, and the fact is a great many are not going to trust it till then. -- Ethan Benson http://www.alaska.net/~erbenson/
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: XFS for 2.4, Marcelo Tosatti |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: XFS for 2.4, Russell Cattelan |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: XFS for 2.4, Marcelo Tosatti |
| Next by Thread: | Re: XFS for 2.4, Jeremy Jackson |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
