[Top] [All Lists]

Re: XFS for 2.4

To: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx>, Marcelo Tosatti <marcelo.tosatti@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: XFS for 2.4
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2003 09:28:41 +0000
In-reply-to: <20031202092004.GA962@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; from erbenson@xxxxxxxxxx on Tue, Dec 02, 2003 at 12:20:04AM -0900
References: <20031201062052.GA2022@frodo> <Pine.LNX.4.44.0312011202330.13692-100000@xxxxxxxxxx> <20031201221058.GA621@frodo> <20031202092004.GA962@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/
On Tue, Dec 02, 2003 at 12:20:04AM -0900, Ethan Benson wrote:
> Another point, 2.6 is not yet stable or fully usuable on many non-x86
> architectures, such as powerpc.

2.6 seems to be much better than 2.4 at least for recent pmac hardware..

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>