| To: | Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx>, Chris PeBenito <pebenito@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [patch] security. namespace |
| From: | Russell Coker <russell@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 2 Dec 2003 16:39:18 +1100 |
| Cc: | sandeen@xxxxxxx, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20031201223835.GB621@frodo> |
| References: | <1070301662.7842.11.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20031201223835.GB621@frodo> |
| Reply-to: | russell@xxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | KMail/1.5.4 |
On Tue, 2 Dec 2003 09:38, Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > I was warned on #xfs that this may break IRIX compatability, so there is > > a note in the Kconfig. However Tad says that the security. attributes > > will show up in the user namespace on a standard XFS linux kernel, but I > > Hmm... security names showing up in the user namespace wouldn't > be a good thing... depends how the code is written, I'll take a > look shortly. It is a good thing for upgrades. If we can set the security attributes on files before booting the SE Linux kernel then it will make things a bit easier for a first install. As 2.4.22 is bad it would be good to see some ACL patches for 2.4.23 soon. I've done my own port of them and put them on http://www.coker.com.au/selinux/kern/ Russell Coker |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: XFS for 2.4, Nathan Scott |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Linux 2.4.22 XFS 1.3.1 reservation ran out, Soumen Chakrabarti |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [patch] security. namespace, Nathan Scott |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [patch] security. namespace, Nathan Scott |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |