| To: | Jeremy Jackson <jerj@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Repairing XFS |
| From: | Keith Owens <kaos@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 16 Dec 2003 04:26:53 +1100 |
| Cc: | XFS Mailing List <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | Your message of "Mon, 15 Dec 2003 11:24:50 CDT." <3FDDE052.9030904@coplanar.net> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Mon, 15 Dec 2003 11:24:50 -0500, Jeremy Jackson <jerj@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >Joshua Schmidlkofer wrote: > >> evolution, and the Interrupt took my box. The entire UI deadlocked, but >> the box would still ping. =(. No ssh, so I reset, and went to my > >Question for XFS guys - in general, would kernel Alt-SysRq-U make for a >"cleaner" crash? Only if the ssytem is still capable of doing disk I/O. Same with sysrq-s. Both issue the request then rely on the kernel being able to do I/O. Some crashes are so bad that nothing works. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: ATrpms has updated RH + XFS 1.3 RPMs, Vernon A. Fort |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: ATrpms has updated RH + XFS 1.3 RPMs, Eric Sandeen |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Repairing XFS, Jeremy Jackson |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Repairing XFS, Norman Zhang |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |