On Thu, 2003-12-11 at 08:06, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 10, 2003 at 11:20:52AM -0600, Austin Gonyou wrote:
> > ACLs are also available for even many virtual FS in 2.6 now, with many
> > backports going to 2.4 for bugfixes, etc. Since ACLs are part of the XFS
> > code-base, I'd imagine they'd come along. Christoph?
> I don't think adding ACL support to 2.4 makes sense at this stage.
As XFS has ACL support out of the box, I think that most XFS users use
them. It means (at least for me) that I need to patch the kernel anyway.
Just some additional work for end-user.
As the patches are trivial (they say so :) it would be nice to have them