xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Fwd: XFS merged in 2.4

To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Fwd: XFS merged in 2.4
From: Olaf Fraczyk <olaf@xxxxxxx>
Date: 11 Dec 2003 11:42:42 +0100
Cc: Austin Gonyou <austin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Ethan Benson <erbenson@xxxxxxxxxx>, XFS List <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20031211070630.A14447@infradead.org>
References: <20031210101142.GF3294@plato.local.lan> <1071076851.2337.6.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20031211070630.A14447@infradead.org>
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Thu, 2003-12-11 at 08:06, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 10, 2003 at 11:20:52AM -0600, Austin Gonyou wrote:
> > ACLs are also available for even many virtual FS in 2.6 now, with many
> > backports going to 2.4 for bugfixes, etc. Since ACLs are part of the XFS
> > code-base, I'd imagine they'd come along. Christoph?
> 
> I don't think adding ACL support to 2.4 makes sense at this stage.
Hi,

As XFS has ACL support out of the box, I think that most XFS users use
them. It means (at least for me) that I need to patch the kernel anyway.
Just some additional work for end-user.
As the patches are trivial (they say so :) it would be nice to have them
in.

Regards,

Olaf 


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>