| To: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | sunit, swidth question - mkfs.xfs tuning |
| From: | Joshua Schmidlkofer <joshua@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 09 Dec 2003 15:23:20 -0800 |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Howdy, WOO HOOO!! On 2.4 inclusion, BTW. (good going!) An old e-mail from Christian Guggenberger recommends swidth be (n-1) disks for RAID5. Is that correct? I have a 66GB volume so I was looking at: Mylex AcceleRAID 170, 6 disks in a RAID 5. (4GB system memory) mkfs.xfs -d su=64k,sw=5 -l size=32m,sunit=64k -L "data" /dev/... Is this correct? Is 32mb a good journal size? This is a mail server, lots of small files, do I need to optimize the inode options? I don't quite understand the full impact of performance here. thanks, Joshua |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [Bug 209] Kernel 2.4.20-xfs memory leaks, bugzilla-daemon |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [Bug 209] Kernel 2.4.20-xfs memory leaks, bugzilla-daemon |
| Previous by Thread: | [Bug 209] Kernel 2.4.20-xfs memory leaks, bugzilla-daemon |
| Next by Thread: | Re: sunit, swidth question - mkfs.xfs tuning, Christian Guggenberger |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |