xfs
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: XFS for 2.4

from [Jeremy Jackson] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: Ethan Benson <erbenson@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: XFS for 2.4
From: Jeremy Jackson <jerj@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2003 11:08:25 -0500
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <marcelo.tosatti@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
References: <20031202002347.GD621@frodo> <Pine.LNX.4.44.0312020919410.13692-100000@logos.cnet> <20031202120642.GC962@plato.local.lan>
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.0.0) Gecko/20020623 Debian/1.0.0-0.woody.1
One example is EVMS (device-mapper) snapshots. Not stable in 2.6, yet related to XFS.

It would be nice if the XFS team could maintain patches for newer 2.4 kernels of official releases (ie 1.3.1). This would ease the tension somewhat.

Regards,

Jeremy Jackson

Ethan Benson wrote: 
On Tue, Dec 02, 2003 at 09:22:48AM -0200, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:

My whole point is "2.6 is almost out of the door and its so much better". Its much faster, much cleaner. 


2.6.10 is NOT almost out the door, and the fact is a great many are
not going to trust it till then.





[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: XFS for 2.4, Darrell Michaud
Next by Date:  Re: XFS for 2.4, Jeremy Jackson
Previous by Thread:  Re: XFS for 2.4, Ethan Benson
Next by Thread:  Re: XFS for 2.4, Austin Gonyou
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]