| To: | Alberto Nava <beto@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: direct-IO writes strange behavior |
| From: | Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sat, 29 Nov 2003 12:39:22 +1100 |
| Cc: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <3FC7F2E1.6070202@xxxxxxxxxxx>; from beto@xxxxxxxxxxx on Fri, Nov 28, 2003 at 05:14:09PM -0800 |
| References: | <3FBECF7E.6010509@xxxxxxxxxxx> <3FBFEF6A.3000609@xxxxxxxxxxx> <20031127004420.77f31a9c.akpm@xxxxxxxx> <3FC78FA4.2090000@xxxxxxxxxxx> <3FC7F2E1.6070202@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.2.5i |
On Fri, Nov 28, 2003 at 05:14:09PM -0800, Alberto Nava wrote: > Alberto Nava wrote: > > > > > I'll try this again on test9 or test11. > > > I tried this with the 2.6.0-test11 and it works fine. The 512k > writes to a new file are propagaded all the way to the drives. It > work without having to use '-d unwritten' or preallocation. > > Here is a snip of the proc file I used to verify it. > > (8,16)@85886 b=f24f0d80 r=ef9c49b0 s=140288(size=524288) prio=0 rw 1 > (8,32)@85886 b=ef891680 r=ef9c47b8 s=140288(size=524288) prio=0 rw 1 > (8,48)@85895 b=ef891680 r=ef9c49b0 s=140288(size=524288) prio=0 rw 1 > (8,64)@85895 b=f24f0d80 r=ef9c47b8 s=140288(size=524288) prio=0 rw 1 > (8,80)@85903 b=ef891680 r=ef9c47b8 s=140288(size=524288) prio=0 rw 1 > thanks for checking. > Thanks a lot for your help no problem. cheers. -- Nathan |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: direct-IO writes strange behavior, Alberto Nava |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [Bug 284] Log reservation runs out with bonnie++, bugzilla-daemon |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: direct-IO writes strange behavior, Alberto Nava |
| Next by Thread: | [Bug 290] New: XFS Kernel Memory Leak, bugzilla-daemon |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |