xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: direct-IO writes strange behavior

To: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: direct-IO writes strange behavior
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2003 14:25:55 -0800
Cc: beto@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20031127211827.GB708@frodo>
References: <3FBECF7E.6010509@xxxxxxxxxxx> <3FBFEF6A.3000609@xxxxxxxxxxx> <20031127004420.77f31a9c.akpm@xxxxxxxx> <20031127211827.GB708@frodo>
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> hi Andrew,
> 
> On Thu, Nov 27, 2003 at 12:44:20AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > Alberto Nava <beto@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > I've done some more digging on this issue. The reason the
> > >  request is going in 4k pages is that the direct-io code is
> > >  giving up in do_direct_IO() and the request is issued as buffer IO :-(.
> > 
> > You seem to be using a -mm kernel.  It has extensive and not-quite-complete
> > and not-really-tested-at-all-with-XFS direct-io changes.
> 
> 
> Alberto's original mail said:
> 
> > I'm seeing a very strange behavior when I write to a file using 512k
> > direct-io writes. The filesystem is XFS and the kernel is 2.6.0-test9.
> 

I know.   But the code which he quoted had -mm stuff in it.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>