xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: 2.4.23-rc3+XFS internal error

To: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: 2.4.23-rc3+XFS internal error
From: "Tomi Orava" <tomimo+linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2003 23:26:02 +0200 (EET)
Importance: Normal
In-reply-to: <20031127211653.GA708@frodo>
References: <34891.194.237.142.5.1069920862.squirrel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20031127211653.GA708@frodo>
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.2
> On Thu, Nov 27, 2003 at 10:14:22AM +0200, Tomi Orava wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I received the following error message last night, which obviously
>> resulted lots of problems while running xfs_repair, as the xfs_repair
>> was unable to get some inodes fixed properly, even though the repair
>> command was ran several times. In the end I found that the problematic
>> inodes belong to some directories which had been already moved to
>> lost+found directory and by renaming and the old lost+found
>> directory to other name and recreating the dir finally fixed those
>> problems.
>> However, the xfs_repair still complains about "rebuilding directory
>> inode
>> 128" which belongs to "/" ... That one is still not fixed.
>
> Not clear what caused the original problem (h/ware or s/ware)
> but it looks like xfs_repair has fixed things up for you --
> 128 will be your root inode, and it will continually be rebuilt
> when you run repair if you don't remove "/lost+found" between
> each invocation.  For more details see the archives, eg:
> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-xfs&m=102981254408403&w=2

Thats great! I was little bit worried that I couldn't get rid
of that one particular message while running xfs_repair as I couldn't
figure what the message actually ment.
So it seems that everything got cleaned up and the system
has been running nicely after the crash with older kernel.

Thanks!

Tomi Orava

-- 
tomimo+linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>