| To: | Greg Whynott <greg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: immutable bits |
| From: | Christian Guggenberger <christian.guggenberger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 20 Nov 2003 20:08:36 +0100 |
| Cc: | Net Llama! <netllama@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <3FBCFFF2.6F8C3F1A@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <3FBCF711.CBEFC5EE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.55.0311201236060.14338@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <3FBCFFF2.6F8C3F1A@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Reply-to: | christian.guggenberger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Thu, 2003-11-20 at 18:54, Greg Whynott wrote: > thanks for the reply. > > chattr works wonders on an ext file system, it is what i spoke of > actually. > > issuing "chattr +i foo" would cause foo to be 'unlinkable' until you > issued a "chattr -i foo". i believe this command is only for ext file > systems, but i could be wrong. > this should definitly work on a xfs filesystem, too - at least it does so here on my system... christian |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: immutable bits, Greg Whynott |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: immutable bits, Christian Guggenberger |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: immutable bits, Greg Whynott |
| Next by Thread: | Re: immutable bits, Christian Guggenberger |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |