xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: FC1 + XFS 1.3.1: test SRPM available

To: Müller Miklós <mmuller@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: FC1 + XFS 1.3.1: test SRPM available
From: Axel Thimm <Axel.Thimm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2003 13:23:57 +0100
Cc: sandeen@xxxxxxx, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <64114.193.110.58.52.1068634650.squirrel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <1068164684.1405.42.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <64114.193.110.58.52.1068634650.squirrel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 11:57:30AM +0100, Müller Miklós wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I've build the binaries successfully with rpm -bb.
> It created the kernel-source, kernel-doc, kernel-BOOT,
> and kernel-debuginfo rpms in /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/i386.
> 
> Now how do i go on with compiling kernel-i[56]86, and kernel-smp?

add '--target <arch>' to the rpmbuild command replacing <arch> with
i686, athlon, i586 etc.

smp/bigmem stuff is automatically build for the archs supporting it
(unless you turn it off).

> Thanks:
> Miklos
> 
> > So I was feeling charitable today...
> >
> > You'll find an SRPM in ftp://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs/testing/FC1 that
> > seems to more or less pass our QA suite.  It's a hurry-up job though, so
> > give it some cautious testing if you'd like.
> >
> > To the RH folks, if you're listening, I think I've done patches in such
> > a way that you can strip out acls & dmapi, and have a functional xfs
> > with extremely minimal impact to the rest of the kernel.
> > (linux-2.4.22-xfs-exports.patch is the only thing we -really- need to be
> > able to ship an out-of-kernel module, linux-2.4.22-xfs-inode-init.patch
> > would be nice).
> >
> > -Eric
> >
> 
> 
> 

-- 
Axel.Thimm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Attachment: pgpuQnq0OZY0r.pgp
Description: PGP signature

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>