xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: FC1 + XFS 1.3.1: test SRPM available

To: <sandeen@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: FC1 + XFS 1.3.1: test SRPM available
From: "Müller Miklós" <mmuller@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2003 11:57:30 +0100 (CET)
Cc: <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Importance: Normal
In-reply-to: <1068164684.1405.42.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <1068164684.1405.42.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
Hi,

I've build the binaries successfully with rpm -bb.
It created the kernel-source, kernel-doc, kernel-BOOT,
and kernel-debuginfo rpms in /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/i386.

Now how do i go on with compiling kernel-i[56]86, and kernel-smp?

Thanks:
Miklos

> So I was feeling charitable today...
>
> You'll find an SRPM in ftp://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs/testing/FC1 that
> seems to more or less pass our QA suite.  It's a hurry-up job though, so
> give it some cautious testing if you'd like.
>
> To the RH folks, if you're listening, I think I've done patches in such
> a way that you can strip out acls & dmapi, and have a functional xfs
> with extremely minimal impact to the rest of the kernel.
> (linux-2.4.22-xfs-exports.patch is the only thing we -really- need to be
> able to ship an out-of-kernel module, linux-2.4.22-xfs-inode-init.patch
> would be nice).
>
> -Eric
>
> --
> Eric Sandeen      [C]XFS for Linux   http://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs
> sandeen@xxxxxxx   SGI, Inc.          651-683-3102




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>