[Top] [All Lists]

Re: FC1 + XFS 1.3.1: test SRPM available

To: Stefan Smietanowski <stesmi@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: FC1 + XFS 1.3.1: test SRPM available
From: Russell Cattelan <cattelan@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2003 19:35:00 -0600
Cc: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <3FAAEF21.1040900@xxxxxxxxxx>
References: <1068164684.1405.42.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <3FAAEF21.1040900@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Thu, 2003-11-06 at 19:02, Stefan Smietanowski wrote:
> Hi Eric.
> > So I was feeling charitable today...
> > 
> > You'll find an SRPM in ftp://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs/testing/FC1 that
> > seems to more or less pass our QA suite.  It's a hurry-up job though, so
> > give it some cautious testing if you'd like.
> > 
> > To the RH folks, if you're listening, I think I've done patches in such
> > a way that you can strip out acls & dmapi, and have a functional xfs
> > with extremely minimal impact to the rest of the kernel. 
> > (linux-2.4.22-xfs-exports.patch is the only thing we -really- need to be
> > able to ship an out-of-kernel module, linux-2.4.22-xfs-inode-init.patch
> > would be nice).
> Someone's been keeping busy I see. Alright, I'll try to have a mockup an
> installer this weekend for FC1. No promises though.
Are you going to do just the DVD version? 
If you get anaconda in shape I'll work on getting
the ordered genhdlist worked out.
Which is usually the most annoying part of the "CD 4" installer

> Excellent work. One thought only ... Aren't ACLs enabled on the normal
> FC1 kernel?
> // Stefan
Russell Cattelan <cattelan@xxxxxxxxxxx>

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>