| To: | Scott Fagg <scott.fagg@xxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: couple of questions about version number |
| From: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | 05 Nov 2003 18:31:07 -0600 |
| Cc: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <sfaa2cb6.001@sydnws03> |
| Organization: | |
| References: | <sfaa2cb6.001@sydnws03> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Wed, 2003-11-05 at 18:12, Scott Fagg wrote: > I understand that 1.3.1 is the version that SGI are encouraging us to use, so > : > > - which versions of the kernel are 1.3.1 patches officially available for ? 2.4.21 and a Red Hat errata kernel (see the ftp site) > - which versions of the kernal do 1.3.1 patches happen to work against ? you tell us ;-) > - how do i tell which version of XFS i'm using ? modinfo xfs, or dmesg | grep -i xfs > - what version of xfs is in 2.6.0-test9 ? Top of development tree minus some delta -Eric -- Eric Sandeen [C]XFS for Linux http://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs sandeen@xxxxxxx SGI, Inc. 651-683-3102 |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | couple of questions about version number, Scott Fagg |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: couple of questions about version number, Scott Fagg |
| Previous by Thread: | couple of questions about version number, Scott Fagg |
| Next by Thread: | Re: couple of questions about version number, Scott Fagg |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |