| To: | Net Llama! <netllama@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: logbufs size? |
| From: | Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sat, 22 Nov 2003 12:33:33 +1100 |
| Cc: | Michael Loftis <mloftis@xxxxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <3FBEA6A3.9090706@linux-sxs.org>; from netllama@linux-sxs.org on Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 03:58:27PM -0800 |
| References: | <44770656.1069426480@[10.1.2.77]> <20031122101921.B1582457@wobbly.melbourne.sgi.com> <3FBEA6A3.9090706@linux-sxs.org> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.2.5i |
On Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 03:58:27PM -0800, Net Llama! wrote: > On 11/21/03 15:19, Nathan Scott wrote: > > > > 2 is the default, although nowadays its automatically bumped up > > if you have oodles of memory (iirc). If you are using a non- > > default value it will show up in /proc/mounts -- e.g. > > /dev/sdb2 /home xfs rw,usrquota,grpquota,logbufs=8 0 0 > > Just curious, how much is oodles? I've got a box with 12GB that doesn't > show any logbufs. > I don't remember off the top of my head - Andi wrote this patch - have a look in xfs_log.c. cheers. -- Nathan |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: logbufs size?, Net Llama! |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | direct-IO writes strange behavior, Alberto Nava |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: logbufs size?, Net Llama! |
| Next by Thread: | Re: logbufs size?, Andi Kleen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |