[Top] [All Lists]

Re: XFS installer for Fedora 1

To: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: XFS installer for Fedora 1
From: Bill Anderson <bill@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 07 Nov 2003 03:54:58 -0700
In-reply-to: <20031106212931.GL13576@puariko.nirvana>
Organization: Immosys LLC
References: <1068144421.1405.4.camel@adic.com> <Pine.LNX.4.44.0311061353200.5397-100000@burgers.bubbanfriends.org> <20031106201337.GG13576@puariko.nirvana> <1068152873.1405.6.camel@stout.americas.sgi.com> <1068153344.2657.212.camel@adic.com> <20031106212931.GL13576@puariko.nirvana>
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Thu, 2003-11-06 at 14:29, Axel Thimm wrote:

> > Has anyone looked at the kernel rpms Arjan is creating for 2.6, there
> > is an unsupported kernel rpm, I have not downloaded or looked inside
> > them, but I have this terrible sinking feeling about it.
> No, xfs is not (yet?) moved to the unsupported rpm:

Hmm I'm running Arjan's test2 kernel, and my entire system is on XFS.
Methinks it's there. ;)

> /lib/modules/2.6.0-0.test9.1.70/kernel/fs/xfs/xfs.ko
> The more important point is will RH introduce proper anaconda support
> for XFS? At least like jfs/reiserfs have with "hidden" enablers? The
> XFS patches are said to have found their way into anaconda, but are
> not enabled (didn't check lately).

THAT is the real question.

Bill Anderson <bill@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Immosys LLC

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>