| To: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: XFS installer for Fedora 1 |
| From: | Bill Anderson <bill@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | 07 Nov 2003 03:54:58 -0700 |
| In-reply-to: | <20031106212931.GL13576@puariko.nirvana> |
| Organization: | Immosys LLC |
| References: | <1068144421.1405.4.camel@adic.com> <Pine.LNX.4.44.0311061353200.5397-100000@burgers.bubbanfriends.org> <20031106201337.GG13576@puariko.nirvana> <1068152873.1405.6.camel@stout.americas.sgi.com> <1068153344.2657.212.camel@adic.com> <20031106212931.GL13576@puariko.nirvana> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Thu, 2003-11-06 at 14:29, Axel Thimm wrote: > > Has anyone looked at the kernel rpms Arjan is creating for 2.6, there > > is an unsupported kernel rpm, I have not downloaded or looked inside > > them, but I have this terrible sinking feeling about it. > > No, xfs is not (yet?) moved to the unsupported rpm: Hmm I'm running Arjan's test2 kernel, and my entire system is on XFS. Methinks it's there. ;) > > /lib/modules/2.6.0-0.test9.1.70/kernel/fs/xfs/xfs.ko > > The more important point is will RH introduce proper anaconda support > for XFS? At least like jfs/reiserfs have with "hidden" enablers? The > XFS patches are said to have found their way into anaconda, but are > not enabled (didn't check lately). THAT is the real question. -- Bill Anderson <bill@xxxxxxxxxxx> Immosys LLC |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: FC1 + XFS 1.3.1: test SRPM available, Axel Thimm |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Anaconda, Ajay Ramaswamy |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: XFS installer for Fedora 1, Axel Thimm |
| Next by Thread: | Re: XFS installer for Fedora 1, Eric Sandeen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |