On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 03:15:44PM -0600, Steve Lord wrote:
> On Thu, 2003-11-06 at 15:07, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> > On Thu, 2003-11-06 at 14:13, Axel Thimm wrote:
> >
> > > Fedora Core 2 is scheduled 4-6 months from now, start lobbying! :) (I
> > > don't think RH will put XFS in the "updates", previously known as
> > > "errata")
> >
> > FC2 is supposed to have the linux 2.6 kernel, so if they strip xfs out
> > of that, then we'll know how they -really- feel about us. ;-)
>
> Has anyone looked at the kernel rpms Arjan is creating for 2.6, there
> is an unsupported kernel rpm, I have not downloaded or looked inside
> them, but I have this terrible sinking feeling about it.
No, xfs is not (yet?) moved to the unsupported rpm:
/lib/modules/2.6.0-0.test9.1.70/kernel/fs/xfs/xfs.ko
The more important point is will RH introduce proper anaconda support
for XFS? At least like jfs/reiserfs have with "hidden" enablers? The
XFS patches are said to have found their way into anaconda, but are
not enabled (didn't check lately).
--
Axel.Thimm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
pgpeCFWln8t2T.pgp
Description: PGP signature
|