[Top] [All Lists]

Re: XFS installer for Fedora 1

To: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: XFS installer for Fedora 1
From: Axel Thimm <Axel.Thimm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2003 22:29:31 +0100
In-reply-to: <1068153344.2657.212.camel@adic.com>
References: <1068144421.1405.4.camel@adic.com> <Pine.LNX.4.44.0311061353200.5397-100000@burgers.bubbanfriends.org> <20031106201337.GG13576@puariko.nirvana> <1068152873.1405.6.camel@stout.americas.sgi.com> <1068153344.2657.212.camel@adic.com>
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 03:15:44PM -0600, Steve Lord wrote:
> On Thu, 2003-11-06 at 15:07, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> > On Thu, 2003-11-06 at 14:13, Axel Thimm wrote:
> > 
> > > Fedora Core 2 is scheduled 4-6 months from now, start lobbying! :) (I
> > > don't think RH will put XFS in the "updates", previously known as
> > > "errata")
> > 
> > FC2 is supposed to have the linux 2.6 kernel, so if they strip xfs out
> > of that, then we'll know how they -really- feel about us.  ;-)
> Has anyone looked at the kernel rpms Arjan is creating for 2.6, there
> is an unsupported kernel rpm, I have not downloaded or looked inside
> them, but I have this terrible sinking feeling about it.

No, xfs is not (yet?) moved to the unsupported rpm:


The more important point is will RH introduce proper anaconda support
for XFS? At least like jfs/reiserfs have with "hidden" enablers? The
XFS patches are said to have found their way into anaconda, but are
not enabled (didn't check lately).

Attachment: pgpeCFWln8t2T.pgp
Description: PGP signature

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>