| To: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: what mkfs.xfs options to use with dealing with many small files. |
| From: | Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | 23 Oct 2003 11:29:11 -0500 |
| Cc: | Greg Whynott <greg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <1066926267.23500.10.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Organization: | |
| References: | <3F97F016.4AB1E881@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1066925583.21480.71.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1066926267.23500.10.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Thu, 2003-10-23 at 11:24, Eric Sandeen wrote: > On Thu, 2003-10-23 at 11:13, Steve Lord wrote: > > > > mkfs.xfs -f -b size=2048k -d agcount=16 /dev/md0 > > > > -b size specifies the basic block size of the filesystem, it is > > in bytes, I do not think 2048k is going to work. Why choose 2K? > > If you are going to switch from the default of 512 then the best > > bet is 4096. > > Not quite, -b is the filesystem block size, not the device sector size, > right? 4k default, page-sized max, 512 minimum. Sorry, I was thinking about -s, not -b. Steve -- Steve Lord voice: +1-651-683-3511 Principal Engineer, Filesystem Software email: lord@xxxxxxx |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: what mkfs.xfs options to use with dealing with many small files., Eric Sandeen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | weird XFS+RAID+big IDE problem?, Derek Glidden |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: what mkfs.xfs options to use with dealing with many small files., Eric Sandeen |
| Next by Thread: | weird XFS+RAID+big IDE problem?, Derek Glidden |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |