| To: | Net Llama! <netllama@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: xfs removed from ftp? |
| From: | Zeitgeist <zeitgeist@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sat, 11 Oct 2003 21:03:26 -0500 |
| Cc: | Martin Spott <Martin.Spott@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.LNX.4.55.0310111939190.15799@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <Pine.LNX.4.53.0310101515170.1331@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <bm9nk8$219$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.55.0310111939190.15799@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Sat, 2003-10-11 at 18:42, Net Llama! wrote: > On Sat, 11 Oct 2003, Martin Spott wrote: > > On the good news front, a person who wishes to remain anonymous told me > that everything should be back on the server within a few days, once SGI's > legal dept puts together a statement. Why is SGI bending their ass over for these losers? All the other companies just ignore them, like SGI should. We all know the company in question is avoiding actually going into the courtroom because they have absolutely NO PROOF and just make bogus statements to inflate their stock prices because nobody buys their shitty, piss-poor products. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: xfs removed from ftp? it's back, Steve Lord |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | kernel warnings on xfstest 013, Roman Vasylyev |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: xfs removed from ftp?, Keith Owens |
| Next by Thread: | Re: xfs removed from ftp?, Net Llama! |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |