| To: | Ethan Benson <erbenson@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: xfs removed from ftp? |
| From: | Net Llama! <netllama@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sat, 11 Oct 2003 23:13:03 -0400 (EDT) |
| Cc: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20031012024034.GC24569@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <Pine.LNX.4.53.0310101515170.1331@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <bm9nk8$219$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.55.0310111939190.15799@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20031012024034.GC24569@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Sat, 11 Oct 2003, Ethan Benson wrote: > > On the good news front, a person who wishes to remain anonymous told me > > that everything should be back on the server within a few days, once SGI's > > legal dept puts together a statement. > > hrm, well i certianly hope they don't decide to wait until SCO is told > to FOAD in court, as that won't happen till 2005 + years later. cvs should be working right now. -- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Lonni J Friedman netllama@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Linux Step-by-step & TyGeMo http://netllama.ipfox.com |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: xfs removed from ftp?, Keith Owens |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: xfs removed from ftp?, Ethan Benson |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: xfs removed from ftp?, Ethan Benson |
| Next by Thread: | Re: xfs removed from ftp?, Martin Spott |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |