xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: TAKE - 2.6.0-test9

To: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: TAKE - 2.6.0-test9
From: Jan Derfinak <ja@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2003 09:24:58 +0100 (CET)
Cc: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20031030211845.GA997@frodo>
References: <200310270006.h9R06QCj4307564@snort.melbourne.sgi.com> <Pine.LNX.4.58.0310300931200.6806@alienAngel.home.sk> <20031030211845.GA997@frodo>
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Fri, 31 Oct 2003, Nathan Scott wrote:

> On Thu, Oct 30, 2003 at 09:34:51AM +0100, Jan Derfinak wrote:
> > On Mon, 27 Oct 2003, Nathan Scott wrote:
> > 
> > Hi.
> 
> Hi Jan,
> 
> > > Merge up to 2.6.0-test9.
> > > 
> > > Date:  Sun Oct 26 16:03:34 PST 2003
> > > Workarea:  snort.melbourne.sgi.com:/home/nathans/clean-2.5.x-xfs
> > > 
> > > The following file(s) were checked into:
> > >   bonnie.engr.sgi.com:/isms/slinx/2.5.x-xfs
> > 
> > Why these changes aren't visible in public CVS?
> > 
> 
> It is there, I just did a cvs checkout and got it.  This tree
> is now called linux-2.6-xfs on oss, although its still called
> 2.5.x-xfs in out internal tree (as you can see above).

Now is there. I updated my cvs 12 hours ago. But in time of writing my e-mail
there was no change in 2.4, 2.6 nor xfs-commands. It was 4 days after
your TAKE so it was weird for me. I checked web cvs too, it was without
change too.

                                jan

-- 


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>