xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: TAKE - 2.6.0-test9

To: Jan Derfinak <ja@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: TAKE - 2.6.0-test9
From: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2003 08:18:45 +1100
Cc: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0310300931200.6806@alienAngel.home.sk>
References: <200310270006.h9R06QCj4307564@snort.melbourne.sgi.com> <Pine.LNX.4.58.0310300931200.6806@alienAngel.home.sk>
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.3i
On Thu, Oct 30, 2003 at 09:34:51AM +0100, Jan Derfinak wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Oct 2003, Nathan Scott wrote:
> 
> Hi.

Hi Jan,

> > Merge up to 2.6.0-test9.
> > 
> > Date:  Sun Oct 26 16:03:34 PST 2003
> > Workarea:  snort.melbourne.sgi.com:/home/nathans/clean-2.5.x-xfs
> > 
> > The following file(s) were checked into:
> >   bonnie.engr.sgi.com:/isms/slinx/2.5.x-xfs
> 
> Why these changes aren't visible in public CVS?
> 

It is there, I just did a cvs checkout and got it.  This tree
is now called linux-2.6-xfs on oss, although its still called
2.5.x-xfs in out internal tree (as you can see above).

cheers.

-- 
Nathan


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>