xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: what mkfs.xfs options to use with dealing with many small files.

To: Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: what mkfs.xfs options to use with dealing with many small files.
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>
Date: 23 Oct 2003 11:24:28 -0500
Cc: Greg Whynott <greg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1066925583.21480.71.camel@jen.americas.sgi.com>
Organization:
References: <3F97F016.4AB1E881@calibredigital.com> <1066925583.21480.71.camel@jen.americas.sgi.com>
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Thu, 2003-10-23 at 11:13, Steve Lord wrote:

> > mkfs.xfs -f -b size=2048k -d agcount=16 /dev/md0
> 
>  -b size specifies the basic block size of the filesystem, it is
>   in bytes, I do not think 2048k is going to work. Why choose 2K?
>   If you are going to switch from the default of 512 then the best
>   bet is 4096.

Not quite, -b is the filesystem block size, not the device sector size,
right?  4k default, page-sized max, 512 minimum.

If you're worried about wasted space on small files, smaller -b might
make sense, at the expense of a slightly more complex code path, I
think.

-Eric

-- 
Eric Sandeen      [C]XFS for Linux   http://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs
sandeen@xxxxxxx   SGI, Inc.          651-683-3102


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>