xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: xfs removed from ftp?

To: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: xfs removed from ftp?
From: Ethan Benson <erbenson@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2003 18:40:34 -0800
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.55.0310111939190.15799@linux-sxs.org>
Mail-copies-to: nobody
Mail-followup-to: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
References: <Pine.LNX.4.53.0310101515170.1331@alienAngel.home.sk> <bm9nk8$219$1@foehn.quickstep.oche.de> <Pine.LNX.4.55.0310111939190.15799@linux-sxs.org>
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
On Sat, Oct 11, 2003 at 07:42:55PM -0400, Net Llama! wrote:
> On Sat, 11 Oct 2003, Martin Spott wrote:
> > Jan Derfinak <ja@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > > During last two weeks there was many problems with ftp access to xfs
> > > source code. There were notices about this problems in mailing list but I
> > > missed answers. Just now I tried ftp://oss.sgi.com but there is no xfs
> > > projects. Does it means that xfs was definitely removed from ftp server?
> >
> > Even if you can't access it on the official site, there are still
> > mirror servers that contain the recent releases,
> 
> That's not true.  I googled for the mirrors, and they're all either months
> out of date, or no longer host the XFS code at all.

well if the mirror is activly mirroring the main sgi site then the
mirror will reflect the deletion of all the XFS files.

> On the good news front, a person who wishes to remain anonymous told me
> that everything should be back on the server within a few days, once SGI's
> legal dept puts together a statement.

hrm, well i certianly hope they don't decide to wait until SCO is told
to FOAD in court, as that won't happen till 2005 + years later.

-- 
Ethan Benson
http://www.alaska.net/~erbenson/

Attachment: pgp1kCj9t4U6r.pgp
Description: PGP signature

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>