| To: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Dealing with a very large file -1,5TB |
| From: | Nathan Straz <nstraz@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 25 Sep 2003 13:51:55 -0500 |
| In-reply-to: | <1064512340.1211.8.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Mail-followup-to: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| References: | <11941-220039425152023140@xxxxxx> <20030925161654.GA12344@xxxxxxx> <1064512340.1211.8.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.3i |
On Thu, Sep 25, 2003 at 12:52:20PM -0500, Steve Lord wrote: > On Thu, 2003-09-25 at 11:16, Nathan Straz wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 25, 2003 at 05:20:23PM +0200, Christoph Klocker wrote: > > > [root@localhost lmdd]# ./lmdd if=/raid/XXX of=internal > > > 8.1920 MB in 0.0776 secs, 105.6065 MB/sec > > > > > > the 105 MB/s seem to be very slow, > > > > I find that you really have to increase the block size you're using for > > I/O. Try adding "bs=1024" or similar to your command lines. Also try > > "odirect=1." > > bs=128k or some other larger value might be more meaningful. Doh! I forgot the "k". I find that block sizes in the 1-4MB range get my the most throughput usually. -- Nate Straz nstraz@xxxxxxx sgi, inc http://www.sgi.com/ Linux Test Project http://ltp.sf.net/ |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | A Connection Has Been Made To: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, connection-awareness-system@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | xfsdump hanging in uninterruptible sleep, Bernd Strieder |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Dealing with a very large file -1,5TB, Steve Lord |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Dealing with a very large file -1,5TB, Christoph Klocker |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |