| To: | Cory Visi <merlin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: XFS recovery issues |
| From: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 23 Sep 2003 14:27:40 +0100 |
| Cc: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx>, Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.LNX.4.30.0309230858410.32341-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; from merlin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx on Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 09:00:25AM -0400 |
| References: | <20030923072012.GC2325@frodo> <Pine.LNX.4.30.0309230858410.32341-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.2.5.1i |
On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 09:00:25AM -0400, Cory Visi wrote: > gcc (GCC) 3.2.3 20030422 (Gentoo Linux 1.4 3.2.3-r1, propolice) > > The lines in xfs_log.h seem to only affect 2.96. Could this still be an > issue? Should I try the 2.96 code? It should not be needed. You could try it anyway or even better try an official gnu compiler release or one of the major distros with gcc expertise instead of strangely patched stuff. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: XFS recovery issues, Cory Visi |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Why df results changes up-down during copy, Eric Sandeen |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: XFS recovery issues, Cory Visi |
| Next by Thread: | Re: XFS recovery issues, Cory Visi |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |