xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Read performance issues with 2.6.0test5?

To: freemyer-ml@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Read performance issues with 2.6.0test5?
From: Frank Hellmann <frank@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2003 14:50:06 +0200
Cc: Austin Gonyou <austin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, XFS List <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <1064253817.1744.1.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Organization: Optical Art Film- und Special-Effects GmbH
References: <3F6EFF6E.9040005@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1064248640.1949.17.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1064253817.1744.1.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.2.1) Gecko/20030512
Hi!

Good suggestion and guess what? Performance is bad on the raw device as well. So it is not an XFS issue...

Sorry for the wrong guess...

                Cheers,
                                Frank...

Greg Freemyer wrote:
On Mon, 2003-09-22 at 12:37, Austin Gonyou wrote:


I agree that these results are odd. Something is amiss here, but there
really are many parts to remove before signifying one or the other. You
could always format that MD volume you made as EXT3 or Reiser and
perform the same test.


If the filesystem is of no value, you could also do you dd to the raw MD
volume.

If that has similar problems then you can forget about xfs as the
bottleneck.
Greg

--
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Frank Hellmann          Optical Art GmbH           Waterloohain 7a
Digital Cinema          http://www.opticalart.de   22769 Hamburg
frank@xxxxxxxxxxxxx     Tel: ++49 40 5111051       Fax: ++49 40 43169199


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>