| To: | freemyer-ml@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Read performance issues with 2.6.0test5? |
| From: | Frank Hellmann <frank@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 23 Sep 2003 14:50:06 +0200 |
| Cc: | Austin Gonyou <austin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, XFS List <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <1064253817.1744.1.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Organization: | Optical Art Film- und Special-Effects GmbH |
| References: | <3F6EFF6E.9040005@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1064248640.1949.17.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1064253817.1744.1.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.2.1) Gecko/20030512 |
Hi!Good suggestion and guess what? Performance is bad on the raw device as well. So it is not an XFS issue...
Sorry for the wrong guess...
Cheers,
Frank...
Greg Freemyer wrote:
On Mon, 2003-09-22 at 12:37, Austin Gonyou wrote:I agree that these results are odd. Something is amiss here, but there really are many parts to remove before signifying one or the other. You could always format that MD volume you made as EXT3 or Reiser and perform the same test.If the filesystem is of no value, you could also do you dd to the raw MD volume. If that has similar problems then you can forget about xfs as thebottleneck.Greg -- -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Frank Hellmann Optical Art GmbH Waterloohain 7a Digital Cinema http://www.opticalart.de 22769 Hamburg frank@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Tel: ++49 40 5111051 Fax: ++49 40 43169199 |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Read performance issues with 2.6.0test5?, Frank Hellmann |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: XFS recovery issues, Cory Visi |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Read performance issues with 2.6.0test5?, Greg Freemyer |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Read performance issues with 2.6.0test5?, Austin Gonyou |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |