xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Read performance issues with 2.6.0test5?

To: Frank Hellmann <frank@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Read performance issues with 2.6.0test5?
From: Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2003 09:29:55 +0200
In-reply-to: <3F6EFF6E.9040005@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
At 15:55 22-9-2003 +0200, Frank Hellmann wrote:
Hi!

That is a bit weird result, isn't it? On the hand-patched 2.4.20-18.9 Kernel with XFS 1.3.0pre4 I'll get much better read performance and about similar write performance. I checked if there are any issues regarding the internal log and tried an external one, but not much of a change with that.

The readahead defaults are skewed. Which comes from the Red Hat Errata kernel. It changed from 2.4.18-27 to 2.4.20-18.

see /proc/sys/vm/max-readahead.
Default went from 127 to 31.

Since you seem to have some decent hardware *koff* I suggest setting max-readahead to something like 511 or so.

Cheers

--
Seth
It might just be your lucky day, if you only knew.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>