xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: XFS 1.3.0 RPMS for Red Hat 7.3 (was XFS 1.3.0pre4 ...)

To: Paulo Matos <pjsm@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: XFS 1.3.0 RPMS for Red Hat 7.3 (was XFS 1.3.0pre4 ...)
From: Axel Thimm <Axel.Thimm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2003 20:35:11 +0300
Cc: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0309181759040.716-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20030916194835.GA3676@xxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.44.0309181759040.716-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 06:03:37PM +0100, Paulo Matos wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Sep 2003, Axel Thimm wrote:
> 
> > On Tue, Sep 16, 2003 at 08:35:34PM +0100, Paulo Matos wrote:
> > > Since those for RH7.3 on http://atrpms.physik.fu-berlin.de/name/kernel/, 
> > > are marked as bleeding...
> > 
> > Please try them nevertheless. If they don't get enough testing
> > (including positive feedback) they won't get out of bleeding. ;)
> 
>       I try to rebuild it from src.rpm but I get a lot of rejected 
> patches, I think this is due to patch-2.4.21-pre3 you do first... but
> even after commenting the folowing lines:
> [...]
> it does not build... any hints? IS the src.rpm package out-dated? I try to 
> build it under i686 and athlon archs same result...

That sounds really weird (note that patch-2.4.21-pre3 is simply the
first of a long series of patches that fails, i.e. all the patching
fails on your system).

How did you try to rebuild? Could you post the steps? You did use
rpmbuild (--rebuild|-bb), or did you try by manual patching?

(And why did you want to rebuild in the first place? Don't the built
kernels and kernel-source satisfy your needs?)
-- 
Axel.Thimm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Attachment: pgpuJXQnZXUOy.pgp
Description: PGP signature

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>