xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: XFS tree for Red Hat should be moved to at least kernel-2.4.20-20

To: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: XFS tree for Red Hat should be moved to at least kernel-2.4.20-20
From: Ethan Benson <erbenson@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2003 10:41:57 -0800
In-reply-to: <46483.213.173.165.140.1063724939.squirrel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Mail-copies-to: nobody
Mail-followup-to: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0309140958220.17784-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.44.0309141045391.15430-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20030914214745.GD827@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <46483.213.173.165.140.1063724939.squirrel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
On Tue, Sep 16, 2003 at 05:08:59PM +0200, Simon Matter wrote:
> No please. There are better solutions than mkfs in most situations. Why
> being so afraid about kernel modules and rootkit binaries? Boot from a CD
> like knoppix or similar. Then mount all filesystems and examine the
> system. First check whether your rpm database has been touched. A recent
> backup may help here. Then rpm is your friend by finding out which files

no its not, an attacker can modify the rpmdb.

-- 
Ethan Benson
http://www.alaska.net/~erbenson/

Attachment: pgpUudHUdDsjH.pgp
Description: PGP signature

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>