| To: | Mike Burger <mburger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: XFS tree for Red Hat should be moved to at least kernel-2.4.20-20 |
| From: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sun, 14 Sep 2003 10:00:56 -0500 (CDT) |
| Cc: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.LNX.4.44.0309140844150.15430-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
If you absolutely need this now, I'd suggest Axel's RPMs from http://atrpms.physik.fu-berlin.de/ - he has the 1.3 patches + 2.4.20 already built. It would be great if we had the bandwidth to always be up to date with Red Hat, but that's not always the case. I didn't know there were serious security issues with -19, so I'll see if we can get -20 done sooner than later. -Eric On Sun, 14 Sep 2003, Mike Burger wrote: > If we could see the current XFS merged into the Red Hat 2.4.20-20 sources, > I'd be happy to test them out. > > Of course, at the moment, I'd be happy if I knew how the hell the bastard > got into my system, but that's another story. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | XFS tree for Red Hat should be moved to at least kernel-2.4.20-20, Mike Burger |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: XFS tree for Red Hat should be moved to at least kernel-2.4.20-20, Mike Burger |
| Previous by Thread: | XFS tree for Red Hat should be moved to at least kernel-2.4.20-20, Mike Burger |
| Next by Thread: | Re: XFS tree for Red Hat should be moved to at least kernel-2.4.20-20, Mike Burger |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |