xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Announce: XFS split patches for 2.4.22

To: Ethan Benson <erbenson@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Announce: XFS split patches for 2.4.22
From: Net Llama! <netllama@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2003 09:25:54 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20030908112703.GH943@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20030908105514.GH4063@xxxxxxxxxxx> <2413.1063019611@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20030908112703.GH943@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Mon, 8 Sep 2003, Ethan Benson wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 09:13:31PM +1000, Keith Owens wrote:
> > On Mon, 8 Sep 2003 13:55:14 +0300,
> > Axel Thimm <Axel.Thimm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 02:26:35PM +1000, Keith Owens wrote:
> > >> ftp://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs/download/patches/2.4.22. =20
> > >
> > >I cannot access any files in this directory.
> >
> > I can access that directory from outside SGI, and so can most other
> > people.  The problem is either on your end or between you and
> > oss.sgi.com.  Please ask your network people to investigate.
>
> no it was your ftp server, it was responding with "550 load average is
> 11, anonymous users are not allowed to download with this much load."
> or somesuch, it was doing so in a broken way though so most clients
> didn't properly identify the failure.  in fact its not even possible
> to see the error message unless you use the plain jane bsd ftp
> command, all the others (wget, lftp etc) helpfully hid the message and
> silently malfunctioned.
>
> it seems to be behaving itself now.

Actually, ncftp was also capable of displaying the actual error.

-- 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Lonni J Friedman                                netllama@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Linux Step-by-step & TyGeMo                  http://netllama.ipfox.com


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>