[Top] [All Lists]

RE: Patch 1300 & rpm issue with 1.3.0

To: "'Simon Matter'" <simon.matter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "'Axel Thimm'" <Axel.Thimm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: Patch 1300 & rpm issue with 1.3.0
From: "Kai Leibrandt" <k_leibrandt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2003 09:26:36 +0200
Cc: "'Eric Sandeen'" <sandeen@xxxxxxx>, <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Importance: Normal
In-reply-to: <1055.>
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx

> Well, RH 7.2 is also widely used here and there is quite a 
> big difference between 7.2 ... 9. On 7.2, rpm is statically 
> linked. And then, if an application like rpm breaks with a 
> certain kernel/filesystem, I expect it not to be the only 
> application that breaks. Am I paranoid?
> Simon

That's just what I was thinking; is rpm only an indication that other
apps might have issues as well? If so, how do we identify them and
rectify the problems? In the kernel, or in the app?


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>