On Thu, Aug 28, 2003 at 01:33:11PM +0800, Federico Sevilla III wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 27, 2003 at 12:04:12PM -0500, Steve Lord wrote:
> > It won't. Right now we have 2.4.22 available via bitkeeper from
> > xfs.org, Russell posted this on the list a while ago. The crypto merge
> > into 2.4.22 means hosting it on an SGI web site takes some approvals.
>
> I'm curious: will it make sense to release split patches for 2.4.22 like
> those available for 2.4.21, even if CVS doesn't have the full 2.4.22-xfs
it would make a lot of sense, it would allow people to easily upgrade to
2.4.22 now.
> yet while waiting for the approval due to the crypto merge? Or will
> split patches for 2.4.22 require the same approval anyway?
the patches won't contain any crypto, thus don't require any approval.
--
Ethan Benson
http://www.alaska.net/~erbenson/
pgpMYmOehrTtz.pgp
Description: PGP signature
|