| To: | Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [BUG] 2.6.0-test4-mm1: NFS+XFS=data corruption |
| From: | Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 26 Aug 2003 11:34:29 -0700 |
| Cc: | suparna@xxxxxxxxxx, barryn@xxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <1061920640.25889.1404.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20030824171318.4acf1182.akpm@xxxxxxxx> <20030825193717.GC3562@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20030825124543.413187a5.akpm@xxxxxxxx> <1061852050.25892.195.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20030826031412.72785b15.akpm@xxxxxxxx> <20030826110111.GA4750@xxxxxxxxxx> <20030826104458.448d1eea.akpm@xxxxxxxx> <1061920640.25889.1404.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > Does rpm use readv/writev though? Or does the nfs server? not sure > how this change would affect the original problem report. The NFS server uses multisegment writev. RPM was running at the other end of the ethernet, so it doesn't really matter what sort of write RPM is issuing. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [BUG] 2.6.0-test4-mm1: NFS+XFS=data corruption, Steve Lord |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Patch 1300 & rpm issue with 1.3.0, Simon Matter |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [BUG] 2.6.0-test4-mm1: NFS+XFS=data corruption, Steve Lord |
| Next by Thread: | problems with real-time option., K Ramesh |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |