[Top] [All Lists]

Re: The X in XFS

To: sandeen@xxxxxxx
Subject: Re: The X in XFS
From: "Dan Koren" <koren_dan@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2003 01:01:08 -0700
Cc: curtisanderson1@xxxxxxxxxxx, lord@xxxxxxx, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Reply-to: dk@xxxxxxxxxx
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx

I'm sorry, but I do not have any XFS design specs or documentation in
my hands. I returned all the documents in my posession when I left
SGI 3 years ago -- even though the XFS ones were technically no
longer confidential. I was relying entirely on my memory when I
posted my earlier comments.


From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>
To: Dan Koren <koren_dan@xxxxxxxxxxx>
CC: Curtis Anderson <curtisanderson1@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>, <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: The X in XFS
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2003 23:06:07 -0500 (CDT)

Ok, I have nothing better to do this evening... :)

I'm looking at the earliest XFS design paper I can find,

(Curtis' name is at the top of the authors list)

I do see "xFS" but I do not see "eXtended."  (at least not
anywhere near the words "File System."

Dan, if you have a different (older?) version, please forward
it to me - I'd like to add it to our archive of original
xFS documents.


On Thu, 21 Aug 2003, Dan Koren wrote:

> Well, Curtis, everything is fine and dandy with your
> version. It still does not explain why the XFS Design
> Specs refer to "eXtended File System" on the front page.

Get MSN 8 and enjoy automatic e-mail virus protection. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>