xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: TAKE - pagebuff

To: Kostadin Karaivanov <larry@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: TAKE - pagebuff
From: Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>
Date: 01 Aug 2003 07:20:48 -0500
Cc: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <3F2A5641.6000709@xxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <3F2A3C21.9030909@xxxxxxxxxxx> <1059735252.1923.3.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <3F2A5641.6000709@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Fri, 2003-08-01 at 07:00, Kostadin Karaivanov wrote:
> Steve Lord wrote:
> 
> >On Fri, 2003-08-01 at 05:08, Kostadin Karaivanov wrote:
> >  
> >
> >>The recent as of today linux-2.5-xfs CVS tree does not compile.
> >>I got this error:
> >>
> >>  CC      fs/xfs/pagebuf/page_buf.o
> >>  CC      fs/xfs/pagebuf/page_buf_locking.o
> >>  CC      fs/xfs/linux/xfs_aops.o
> >>fs/xfs/linux/xfs_aops.c: In function `linvfs_direct_IO':
> >>fs/xfs/linux/xfs_aops.c:948: too few arguments to function
> >>`blockdev_direct_IO'
> >>make[2]: *** [fs/xfs/linux/xfs_aops.o] Error 1
> >>make[1]: *** [fs/xfs] Error 2
> >>make: *** [fs] Error 2
> >>root@hosting:/usr/src/linux-2.5-xfs/linux#
> >>    
> >>
> >
> >You may have caught it in mid update, that line number does not
> >match the internal trees (which build). Try updating again, if
> >it still fails, we need to make sure the cvs tree is getting
> >updated correctly.
> >
> >Steve
> >  
> >
> 2 hours later still the same

OK, the tree update must be busted, your line number for the function
is about 40 lines out. I will get someone to refresh the tree, it will
not happen for a few hours I expect.

Steve



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>