xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Patch 1300 & rpm issue with 1.3.0

To: Kai Leibrandt <k_leibrandt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Patch 1300 & rpm issue with 1.3.0
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2003 11:27:05 -0500 (CDT)
Cc: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <Law9-F1248P5o7P6umL0000ca67@hotmail.com>
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Sun, 24 Aug 2003, Kai Leibrandt wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> I just got the 2.4.20-19.9_XFS1.3.0.src.rpm from oss.sgi.com and after 
> building, installing and rebooting I noticed the same issue with rpm that 
> hit me with 2.4.20-18.9... Of course after adding patch 1300 back in all is 
> fine again, so just a quick question; is this going to be the standard way 
> the .src.rpm are packaged, or am I doing something else wrong?

Boy, that's an annoying bug...  it's somewhere in the guts of Red Hat's
kernel + nptl patches + O_DIRECT + rpm.  I think that Red Hat will eventually
have a new version of RPM that works with this kernel.  In the meantime,
I'd either:

a) rebuild with patch 1300 in place, if you don't care about using O_DIRECT
or
b) set up an alias for "rpm" to prefix it with LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.2.5

> Also, is there a howto or readme somewhere where I can find out how to build 
> my own .src.rpm kernel packages from the redhat errata and the XFS patches?

No docs... best documentation is probably the spec file itself.  Which xfs
patches, and which Red Hat kernel packages, do you want to combine?

> MSN 8 helps eliminate e-mail viruses.

really?  ;-)

-Eric



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>