Re: vnodeops

[Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>]

On Sat, 2003-08-16 at 23:37, Ethan Benson wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 17, 2003 at 05:19:08AM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > 
> > So is there any reason to keep the vnodeops layer around?  There's only
> > one implementation of it (xfs_vnodeops) so it seems kind of pointless.
> > Removing it would probably shrink xfs quite a bit, both source and binary.
> 
> i believe its used for CXFS.

It is used by CXFS, and it also lets us keep a medium level of sanity
when attempting to keep Irix and Linux versions of XFS in sync.

Steve