| To: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: NULL file problems (not FAQ...) |
| From: | Robin Humble <rjh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sat, 16 Aug 2003 10:16:51 -0400 |
| In-reply-to: | <20030816080655.GE4735@plato.local.lan> |
| References: | <1060976194.4321.29.camel@blackbird.ssn.revario.com> <Pine.LNX.4.55.0308151540380.756@linux-sxs.org> <1060977257.4321.40.camel@blackbird.ssn.revario.com> <20030816080655.GE4735@plato.local.lan> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.4i |
On Sat, Aug 16, 2003 at 12:06:55AM -0800, Ethan Benson wrote: >On Fri, Aug 15, 2003 at 03:54:18PM -0400, Derek Glidden wrote: >> I can't wait until there's a 2.6-based RedHat that will _force_ >> them to have XFS support... :) >it will do no such thing. they can simply set CONFIG_XFS_FS=n I'm running RedHat9 plus the RedHat unofficial 2.6.0-test3 kernel right now with an all XFS system - no modifications, just 'rpmbuild --rebuild --target athlon ...' then 'rpm -Uvh ...' and the mkinitrd script picked up the XFS root partition etc without drama. http://people.redhat.com/arjanv/2.5/ It's currently packaged into default kernel+modules (including XFS) and 'unsupported' kernel modules. I guess it might change before RH10(?) but I don't see why it should... cheers, robin |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: NULL file problems (not FAQ...), Simon Matter |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [ANNOUNCE] XFS 1.3.0 pre6, Kevin P. Fleming |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: NULL file problems (not FAQ...), Simon Matter |
| Next by Thread: | Re: NULL file problems (not FAQ...), Scott Fagg |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |