| To: | Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: use-after-free in xfs_bawrite() |
| From: | Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sat, 2 Aug 2003 14:15:43 +0200 |
| Cc: | Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20030802050919.2c43cd6f.akpm@osdl.org> |
| References: | <20030802013032.7a42a596.akpm@osdl.org> <20030802115458.GA21440@wotan.suse.de> <20030802050919.2c43cd6f.akpm@osdl.org> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
> > > Seems that dbench is not XFS's favourite benchmark. How come? Do I need > > > more logbufs? > > > > And bigger on disk log than by default. There is a patch in the queue to > > do > > the first, but I think it hasn't reached Linus' tree yet. > > > > Your patch has been merged, and is in the tree I tested. I would still increase the on disk log size. The old defaults are showing their age. -andi |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: use-after-free in xfs_bawrite(), Andrew Morton |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | TAKE - acl/attr fixes, Nathan Scott |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: use-after-free in xfs_bawrite(), Andrew Morton |
| Next by Thread: | Re: use-after-free in xfs_bawrite(), Steve Lord |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |